
The mark of a good newspaper is that it provides fair and equal coverage of both sides of every story. Recently,
The New York Times has been charged with favoring the Republican Party in its coverage of the 2008 presidential election.
A review of the Times from Thursday, Oct. 23 and Friday, Oct. 24 shows that 12 articles about the upcoming election were printed, with two clearly pro-Republican, two clearly pro-Democrat, and the rest in a gray area in between.
The pro-Republican articles include "
How McCain Hopes to Defy the Polls and Win," and "
From Little-Noticed College Student to Star Politician." The first article, as the title suggests, explores what Sen. McCain is doing to overcome his poll deficit and defeat Sen. Obama. The second focuses on Vice Presidential Candidate Sarah Palin, describing her childhood in Alaska.
The pro-Democrat articles are "
Polls Show Obama Gaining Among Bush Voters," and "
In a Father's Tough Life, Principles and Examples to Live By for Biden." "Polls" gives statistics from various demographic groups about their voting preferences, with Obama ahead in many categories. "Father's Tough Life" highlights Vice Presidential Candidate Joe Biden and the role his father played in his formative years and beyond.
It is worth noting that the pro-Republican articles do seem to have more prominence in the paper. The article about McCain was printed on the front page of Friday's paper, while Obama's article is on page A18.
Only two articles can truly be considered neutral. "
Rivals Split on U.S. Power, But Ideas Defy Easy Labels," and "
McCain and Obama Hurl Broadsides at Each Other Over Taxes and Jobs" present both candidates' stances on various issues. "Rivals," a front page article, explores each man's take on foreign policy, while "Broadsides" discusses how both McCain and Obama have been verbally attacking each other.
The remaining six articles focus overwhelmingly more on the Republican Party than the Democratic Party, with five of the six dealing with either McCain or Gov. Palin. However, these articles are not necessarily positive. Three of these articles discuss the controversy Palin is now receiving from the amount of money she has spent on a
new political wardrobe, a controversy unlikely to help the Republican campaign.
The other two Republican articles are also unlikely to promote McCain. "
McCain Is Faltering Among Hispanic Voters" and "
A Onetime McCain Insider Is Now Offering Advice (Unwanted) From the Outside" are full of criticisms of McCain, making it hard to consider these articles pro-Republican, despite their Republican focus.
In order to be equal and fair, The New York Times needs to include more Democratic articles in their political coverage. Though their focus is not necessarily pro-Republican, they certainly have given the Republican Party more press in recent days.